Benitez Computers solution by Contract Law

Benitez Computers solution by Contract LawThe fax displace by Benitez Computers Ltd to its latent customers should be draw attention firstly because the hard-hitting treat to this fax would put Benitez Computers Ltd into complete different positions in lawfulness. The content of the fax could be treated as invitation to treat, as inviting potential customers to make the tin to them. Moreover, it also could be force as offer but still waited for the acceptance from its potential customers. Firstly, if the fax is seen as the invitation to treat, the case would be much more than change to analyze and understand. Because the fax is the not the offer and then(prenominal) the replies by both of Mr. Gerrard and Mr. Torres would be the offers they made to Benitez Computer Ltd. And it is unmistakable to see the general rule would apply to the delay of patch and messages which were sent by different ways rather than development postal rule. Both of Mr. Gerrard and Mr. Torres tri ed to communicate with Benitez Computers Ltd because the offers have to be communicated sooner it could be formed. But they failed and Benitez Computers Ltd never knew their offers until they sold only stocks they breastfeed out. So the offers could not be formed amid Mr. Gerrard, Mr. Torres and Benitez Computers Ltd with respectively.

eve Benitez Computers Ltd received the offers from both of Mr. Gerrard and Mr. Torres before they made an offer with other company, they also had the right to reject their offers. So no distill had been formed. This is clearly illustrated in the case of Powell v Lee. under(a) this circumstance, Benitez Computers Ltd would be in a safe position in the law with respect to the two potential contra! cts. And they did not to take... If you essential to do a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay